Here's an update to my previous post.
I predicted that I would receive the crappiest new water heater to replace the old one. There are many ways to define "crappy" but if you use "energy use" as the criteria I have somehow managed to get something even crappier than the crappiest. Here's a pic of the Energy Label:
You'll probably have to click the pic to enlarge it enough to see that this water heater uses 4881 kWh/year. Compared to 4622 kWh/year for the model that uses the least energy and 4879 for the model that uses the most. Sigh.
Tuesday, August 01, 2006
Craptastic
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
This reminds me of a lable on a Salt Lick that we bought for a co-worker for x-mas. (He really liked salt). On the ingredients lable
"this product contains no more than 100% salt" - or something to that effect.
mess
Heh. Maybe you're just not shopping at the right store.
We got the salt lick at Agway. I'm not sure where else I would be able to get a salt lick.
Post a Comment