If you're looking for the funniest stuff, I suggest starting with the Steve, Don't Eat It Homage and then the travel category. You're on your own with the older posts that have yet to be categorized.

Tuesday, August 01, 2006


Here's an update to my previous post.

I predicted that I would receive the crappiest new water heater to replace the old one. There are many ways to define "crappy" but if you use "energy use" as the criteria I have somehow managed to get something even crappier than the crappiest. Here's a pic of the Energy Label:
You'll probably have to click the pic to enlarge it enough to see that this water heater uses 4881 kWh/year. Compared to 4622 kWh/year for the model that uses the least energy and 4879 for the model that uses the most. Sigh.


Anonymous said...

This reminds me of a lable on a Salt Lick that we bought for a co-worker for x-mas. (He really liked salt). On the ingredients lable

"this product contains no more than 100% salt" - or something to that effect.


talljay said...

Heh. Maybe you're just not shopping at the right store.

Anonymous said...

We got the salt lick at Agway. I'm not sure where else I would be able to get a salt lick.